I STRONGLY agree with you. General public has a mentality that LCDs have better picture quality than plasma TVs. Of course this this totally a false statement.
Many of LCD TV owners' excuse is that plasmas has that famous permenant "burn" effect. Again, they have no idea that plasmas don't have this problem anymore (Unless you freeze the screen for a day or something).
Anther excuse I heard is that they eat more electricity. This is true, but I think it's worth extra $1-2 dollars a month for better picture quality.
So final verdict:
The fact is that plasmas are cheaper AND have better picture quality. This is a win win situation!
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
skimrn @ Jun 9th 2009 4:39PM
I STRONGLY agree with you. General public has a mentality that LCDs have better picture quality
than plasma TVs. Of course this this totally a false statement.
Many of LCD TV owners' excuse is that plasmas has that famous permenant "burn" effect.
Again, they have no idea that plasmas don't have this problem anymore (Unless you freeze the
screen for a day or something).
Anther excuse I heard is that they eat more electricity. This is true, but I think it's worth extra $1-2
dollars a month for better picture quality.
So final verdict:
The fact is that plasmas are cheaper AND have better picture quality. This is a win win situation!
This is a no brainer. End of story...