This more or less cancels out any reason to use the service unless you already have multi-room or have broadband but no way to receive satellite.
At least the implementation looks a little more integrated than the PSP Go!View effort (pretty much DOA due its stupid implementation) but the same underlying problem remains. Sky are greedy f***kers. I think Sky would have a lot more success if they did some deals with more ISPs and bundled service with premium broadband packages rather than charging extra for something people already have.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
DrXym @ May 30th 2009 8:03AM
Sky Player costs too much money, has a pathetic selection of channels and only becomes free if you already pay Sky for a multi-room package.
http://skyplayer.sky.com/aboutskyplayer/online-live-tv.html
This more or less cancels out any reason to use the service unless you already have multi-room or have broadband but no way to receive satellite.
At least the implementation looks a little more integrated than the PSP Go!View effort (pretty much DOA due its stupid implementation) but the same underlying problem remains. Sky are greedy f***kers. I think Sky would have a lot more success if they did some deals with more ISPs and bundled service with premium broadband packages rather than charging extra for something people already have.