<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for SED could still have a future, probably doesn't</title>
<link>http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2009/04/29/sed-could-still-have-a-future-probably-doesnt/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for SED could still have a future, probably doesn't</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SED could still have a future, probably doesn't]]></title><link>http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2009/04/29/sed-could-still-have-a-future-probably-doesnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2009/04/29/sed-could-still-have-a-future-probably-doesnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats it, Canon got all that legal stuff figured out right? So if I make my own I wont get sued? Im tired of waiting for the perfect TV that is not coming out. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slarity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2009 8:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SED could still have a future, probably doesn't]]></title><link>http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2009/04/29/sed-could-still-have-a-future-probably-doesnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2009/04/29/sed-could-still-have-a-future-probably-doesnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sed will always have a future.<br><br>echo hi | sed 's/hi/there/'<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2009 9:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SED could still have a future, probably doesn't]]></title><link>http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2009/04/29/sed-could-still-have-a-future-probably-doesnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2009/04/29/sed-could-still-have-a-future-probably-doesnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL. Not even sure if there will be a perfect TV. (One can only dream) :-)<br><br><br>Chris<br>www.highefjunkies.com]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Highdefjunkies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2009 10:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SED could still have a future, probably doesn't]]></title><link>http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2009/04/29/sed-could-still-have-a-future-probably-doesnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2009/04/29/sed-could-still-have-a-future-probably-doesnt/</guid><description><![CDATA["After proclaiming that the world doesn't care about SED,"<br><br>I don't know where they got that, the world has been waiting for SED until we were told it was dead, or near death because of technological issues.  <br><br>We ALL would love to see SED survive and make it to market, they will be head above LCD's and Plasmas in picture quality.  <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 29th 2009 2:15PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>