I work for Blockbuster, so maybe I can more accurate information. They are working to shift focus away from ordering as many RETAIL copies (movies for sale) and they are looking to get more revenue sharing. This means copies are supplied in bulk at a discounted rate. This in turn means more copies of each film, but in turn Blockbuster must agree to physically destroy a certain number of copies instead of selling them previously viewed, so that the retail value of the title isn't driven too low immediately. Right now Blockbuster has really good ties with Warner and some of the independents. (That's why our store had over 400 copies of Get Smart on release date, and 600 of Dark Knight. A normal title DVD order would be around 100-150 for a major title.) It's Disney that has a pretty bad relationship with Blockbuster since they want more of the profits to come from sales than from rental. (About 30 copies of Wall-E and the Pirates Films to rent.) Blockbuster is trying to get away from selling NEW copies of movies and games, and focusing on selling used earlier and getting rid of titles that aren't selling as well or renting, though this may mean having less catalog titles on the shelves. Not that I don't see the possibility of Blockbuster going under. I personally wish Netflix would just buy them out and turn them into exchange stores to extend the value of their business. But that would actually make sense. Instead the 80,000 people who work for them (yes, 80,000!) will probably lose their jobs in the next few years unless they take their heads out of the sand and keep up with technology. Blu-ray may be their salvation in the future, but it still isn't going to save them if they can't make their retail credit payments!
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
that1guypictures @ Mar 21st 2009 10:24PM
I work for Blockbuster, so maybe I can more accurate information. They are working to shift focus away from ordering as many RETAIL copies (movies for sale) and they are looking to get more revenue sharing. This means copies are supplied in bulk at a discounted rate. This in turn means more copies of each film, but in turn Blockbuster must agree to physically destroy a certain number of copies instead of selling them previously viewed, so that the retail value of the title isn't driven too low immediately. Right now Blockbuster has really good ties with Warner and some of the independents. (That's why our store had over 400 copies of Get Smart on release date, and 600 of Dark Knight. A normal title DVD order would be around 100-150 for a major title.) It's Disney that has a pretty bad relationship with Blockbuster since they want more of the profits to come from sales than from rental. (About 30 copies of Wall-E and the Pirates Films to rent.) Blockbuster is trying to get away from selling NEW copies of movies and games, and focusing on selling used earlier and getting rid of titles that aren't selling as well or renting, though this may mean having less catalog titles on the shelves. Not that I don't see the possibility of Blockbuster going under. I personally wish Netflix would just buy them out and turn them into exchange stores to extend the value of their business. But that would actually make sense. Instead the 80,000 people who work for them (yes, 80,000!) will probably lose their jobs in the next few years unless they take their heads out of the sand and keep up with technology. Blu-ray may be their salvation in the future, but it still isn't going to save them if they can't make their retail credit payments!