<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Samsung's Amorphous Oxide TFT should make OLED production cheaper</title>
<link>http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2008/12/25/samsungs-amorphous-oxide-tft-should-make-oled-production-cheape/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Samsung's Amorphous Oxide TFT should make OLED production cheaper</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Amorphous Oxide TFT should make OLED production cheaper]]></title><link>http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2008/12/25/samsungs-amorphous-oxide-tft-should-make-oled-production-cheape/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2008/12/25/samsungs-amorphous-oxide-tft-should-make-oled-production-cheape/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why are there so many die-hard Samsung fans out there? Why do people prefer Samsung flat-panels over Sony or Panasonic? <br>Is it because Samsung's picture looks more natural?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roland]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 2:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Amorphous Oxide TFT should make OLED production cheaper]]></title><link>http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2008/12/25/samsungs-amorphous-oxide-tft-should-make-oled-production-cheape/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2008/12/25/samsungs-amorphous-oxide-tft-should-make-oled-production-cheape/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because Samsung is generally better than the rest when it comes to flat panel LCD's. Not only is it equal or sometimes better in picture quality, it also has more features and are generally equal or cheaper than the rest. Also, their focus on the design of the flat panel sets is a standout from the rest of the group. Not only does it look good when turned on, it looks good when turned off. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ConceptVBS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Amorphous Oxide TFT should make OLED production cheaper]]></title><link>http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2008/12/25/samsungs-amorphous-oxide-tft-should-make-oled-production-cheape/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2008/12/25/samsungs-amorphous-oxide-tft-should-make-oled-production-cheape/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone want to defend Sony or Panasonic?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roland]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 9:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Amorphous Oxide TFT should make OLED production cheaper]]></title><link>http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2008/12/25/samsungs-amorphous-oxide-tft-should-make-oled-production-cheape/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://enghddev.weblogsinc.com/2008/12/25/samsungs-amorphous-oxide-tft-should-make-oled-production-cheape/</guid><description><![CDATA[Largest 40" OLED Display, huh?<br><br>Wouldn't it also be the smallest 40" display?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SugB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 10:41PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>