Skip to Content
I think mastering in 8K might be approaching diminishing returns, but it does prove useful for archival purposes. http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/features/2880/the-truth-about-6k.html
That article is spot on for transferring 35mm film into digital, but this was shot at 70mm, which means you actually do get a benefit from going beyond 4k.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
IseWise @ Oct 24th 2008 11:34PM
I think mastering in 8K might be approaching diminishing returns, but it does prove useful for archival purposes.
http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/features/2880/the-truth-about-6k.html
madgamer @ Oct 25th 2008 9:57AM
That article is spot on for transferring 35mm film into digital, but this was shot at 70mm, which means you actually do get a benefit from going beyond 4k.